Typology of social interactions

Interpersonal interactions typology is composed with respect to quality and the amount of people taking part in the conversation procedure. Subsequently just three variations of relationships may occur if we discuss amount.

Regarding quality, this qualification signifies, to begin with, the requirement to consider heterogeneity or the homogeneity of the communicating organizations. Requirements of homogeneity could be recognized a lot of, for actually somehow their whole combination it is barely feasible to account. Consequently, Sorokin provides hems most crucial. In his viewpoint, you ought to particularly stress belonging.

In the micro level, the procedures of conversation between folks who are in immediate and direct contact are analyzed; conversation that was such happens primarily within teams that were small. In the macro level of conversation that is interpersonal, there interacts of buildings and big sociable teams below the curiosity of scientists addresses, first cultural establishments, of all. Within this area, we shortly contemplate just some of the very typical ideas as well as their limbs.

Among the many well-known completely created and ideas explaining interpersonal conversation may be exchange’s concept. Generally, sociologists has long get to be the emphasis of the medical control such as for instance anthropology, but just lately took up to speed the conceptualization of interpersonal purchase in the perspective of the trade of relationships, interpersonal framework and interpersonal conversation. The thought of exchange’s rational fundamentals are explained at length within the classical economy, the creators of whom Jones and Bentham thought the primary driving element in the game of any individual may be the desire to have revenue and power. Within the XIX-XX century in several works on cultural anthropology directed within the existence of simple tribes towards the essential part of trade dealings.

George People found the final outcome that such thoughts as “standing”, “part”, “conformism”, “energy”, etc., proven in sociology, must certainly be described not from the motion of macro cultural buildings, as is traditional in functionalism, but in the perspective These interpersonal relationships that produce them. Those relations’ substance, based on People, may be the wish of individuals to get rewards and advantages, in addition to generally share these benefits.